Many of you have emailed me about this horribly sad story: “Toledo hospital nurse accidentally throws away healthy donor kidney during transplant surgery.”
As a blogger, I wish I could go to the “gemba” to really help investigate and find the root cause that answers the question “why did a kidney mistakenly get thrown in the trash?”
There are more answers than questions…
The hospital has suspended the transplant program for the time being. This is the equivalent to “stopping the line” when a problem cannot be resolved in a Lean factory, like Toyota.
The donated organ was supposed to be immediately transferred to the waiting patient, but at some point it was tossed out with the medical waste.
It took about an hour to locate the discarded kidney, which was by then ruined, hospital officials said.
Yikes.
At least the problem wasn't covered up… somebody said “a mistake was made” and, rather than forcing the issue and trying to transplant the kidney anyway, potential future problems were averted… so credit should be given there. In an ultimately dysfunctional environment, somebody might have tried to use the kidney anyway, instead of consulting with the family to talk about the reality of the situation. Since another likely donor kidney would be available (from another family member?) they decided not to take any risks.
Can you imagine donating a kidney for a sibling… only to have it end up in the trash?
Two operating-room staff nurses were suspended with pay following the incident. They were identified as Melanie Lemay and Judith Moore. Both have refused to comment.
This leads to more questions:
If there's a surgical team, why were two nurses the only ones suspended? (Update: “Third person suspended over failed kidney transplant at UTMC” — an administrator). Note, it seems rare for a manager to be disciplined when an error occurs.
Dr. Michael Rees, the UTMC transplant surgeon who removed the kidney before it was ruined, has not faced any discipline, said UTMC President Dr. Lloyd Jacobs.
If we're suspending people, why not the surgeon?
The reason given by many, for suspending people with pay, is so they will cooperate with the investigation. The hospital says they want to understand how this occurred (process problem?) so they can prevent it in the future. So, kudos for that.
But how could a problem like this occur? Were there unusual circumstances that caused distractions? Why was there possibly no clear responsibility for who was supposed to trace and watch the kidney? Why wasn't there a process that would prevent problems?
Aviation has learned from past catastrophes where nobody in the pilot was actually flying the plane or paying attention to the altitude. Why wasn't somebody in the O.R. laser focused on the kidney and keeping it safe?
It will be interesting to follow what happens. Will people get fired? End up in jail? Or, will we have real improvements and prevention of future problems?
How can other hospitals learn from this mistake and the circumstances involved, so this NEVER happens again ANYWHERE?
What are your thoughts or your questions about this situation? What is your transplant center doing to make sure this never happens to another kidney or another organ?
What do you think? Please scroll down (or click) to post a comment. Or please share the post with your thoughts on LinkedIn – and follow me or connect with me there.
Did you like this post? Make sure you don't miss a post or podcast — Subscribe to get notified about posts via email daily or weekly.
Check out my latest book, The Mistakes That Make Us: Cultivating a Culture of Learning and Innovation:
Very sad story. Hopefully this will generate a call to action. I feel bad that our system could allow such a thing to happen. It is easy to find fault with our clinical quality. I am pretty sure there are relatively equal or worse grievous mistakes that we Lean implementers have made that have derailed improvements that might have prevented such events in our own organizations.
Thanks for your comment. I think what’s sad isn’t the “clinical quality,” but rather the “process quality” that allowed the kidney to be throw into the trash. I’m certain everybody involved had the clinical training required (and the common sense) to know that shouldn’t have happened.
I’m curious to hear more about what you mean by your last sentence or an anonymous example of how mistakes by Lean implementors might derail process improvement efforts, in this type of situation or others?
My own organization has been working on Lean for several years. Progress has been lagging for a number of reasons, one of which was some bad direction I gave early on. In the meanwhile we haven’t made any type of improvement in reducing many types of patient harm and most care processes are status quo. Better direction on my part could have resulted in more processes being improved and presumably less patient harm. I haven’t been suspended with pay. I think the lessons are around improving the process we use to improve processes. I am very grateful to learn from those that have acknowledged their failures in implementing Lean. I think John Toussaint, Pat Gabow, Gary Kaplan, and others never talk about Lean without talking about the urgency of improving patient safety and/or improving the human condition. If we lose sight of that then Lean becomes much less inspirational and more about a better way to run a business.
I agree. There are far more pressing issues facing healthcare than trying to 5S the desk drawer at the nurses’ station. Let’s fix quality and patient safety first, eh? I find Toussaint, et. al. and Paul O’Neill to be very inspiring on these issues…. listen to O’Neill at http://leanblog.org/124 if you haven’t heard him.
BTW, the bad direction was to move on without addressing and fully understanding specific leadership roles and responsibilities.