Just heard on CNN, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts:
“… Congress had a balanced intent. You can't look at another provision and say this promotes patient protection without asking if it's affordable.”
Unfortunately, it seems the Chief Justice may have fallen into the common trap of thinking patient safety (a form of patient protection) must inherently cost more and that we must strike a balance. Or the law isn't really about protecting 200,000 Americans from deaths due to preventable medical errors.
So many Lean healthcare efforts are showing that better quality and safety, such as reducing falls, reducing infections, reducing medication errors, actually SAVES money (see examples and data). Our improvement efforts must lead to better safety/quality AND lower costs. Whether the law of 2010 accomplishes either or both is a whole other discussion…
What do you think? Please scroll down (or click) to post a comment. Or please share the post with your thoughts on LinkedIn – and follow me or connect with me there.
Did you like this post? Make sure you don't miss a post or podcast — Subscribe to get notified about posts via email daily or weekly.
Check out my latest book, The Mistakes That Make Us: Cultivating a Culture of Learning and Innovation:
