Remember this “improvement”, where an auto supplier was claiming to save money by getting rid of some cleaning staff and having engineers take their own trash from their desks to the central trash bin?
I got an update from the engineer who reported it to me:
“Mice were spotted recently in the office. It would be funny if files were damaged or exterminators now had to be hired to fix this new issue because a wonderful cost save.”
I wonder if they'll again claim a cost savings if they go back to a dedicated cleaning crew?
What do you think? Please scroll down (or click) to post a comment. Or please share the post with your thoughts on LinkedIn – and follow me or connect with me there.
Did you like this post? Make sure you don't miss a post or podcast — Subscribe to get notified about posts via email daily or weekly.
Check out my latest book, The Mistakes That Make Us: Cultivating a Culture of Learning and Innovation:
I can tell you, cleaning people every other day was “Jack Welch” cost savings idea that *has* lead to regular exterminator visits to our building. My question is how much young talent left the company due to the poor conditions prior to the exterminator finally being hired.
Seems to be all around, the idea of cost savings through decreasing cleaning efforts;-(
Here in Leipzig, the city council is planning to reduce the number of trash cans in the public to reduce costs per year -for the city of course- of roughly 50.000$.
What happens if visitors to the city of Leipzig can’t find a trash can around? Standing and waiting for a tram, where do you put your garbage before stepping into the tram?
I think there will be opposite to the cost saving a definite cost increase because the garbage will be found somewhere else, but not in the trash cans;-(
I doubt that the cost saving equation will come to an positive end;-(
So much the thoughts from my side.
Ralf
PS.: Lean can be really found everywhere in life:-))